15.[A]ruined[B]commuted[C]patrolled[D]gained
16.[A]paralleled[B]counteracted[C]duplicated[D]contradicted
17.[A]neglected[B]avoided[C]emphasized[D]admired
18.[A]stages[B]illusions[C]fragments[D]advances
19.[A]With[B]To[C]Among[D]Beyond
20.[A]on the contrary[B]by this means[C]from the outset[D]at that point从科员到副科最快几年
SectionⅡReading Comprehension
文职工作内容Text1
Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents,but in recent years it has been particularly scorned.School districts across the country,most recently Los Angeles Unified,are revising their thinking on his educational ritual.Unfortunately,L.A.Unified has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses,homework may no longer count for more than10%of a student’s academic grade.
This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework.But the policy is unclear and contradictory.Certainly,no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment.But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives,it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.
District administrators say that homework will still be a pat of schooling:teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want.But with homework counting for no more than10%of their grades,students can easily skip half their homework and see vey little difference on their report cards.Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework,but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework?It is quite possible that the homework helped.Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students,the policy imposes a flat,across-the-board rule.
At the same time,the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework.If the district finds homework to be unimportant to its students’academic achievement,it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments,not make them count for almost nothing.Conversely,if homewor
k does nothing to ensure that the homework students are not assigning more than they are willing to review and correct.
The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board,which is responsible for setting educational policy,looks into the matter and conducts public hearings.It is not too late for L.A.Unified to do homework right.
21.It is implied in paragraph1that nowadays homework_____.
[A]is receiving more criticism
[B]is no longer an educational ritual
[C]is not required for advanced courses
[D]is gaining more preferences
22.L.A.Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students_____.
[A]tend to have moderate expectations for their education
[B]have asked for a different educational standard
[C]may have problems finishing their homework
[D]have voiced their complaints about homework
B should not be associated with girls'innocence
C cannot explain girls'lack of imagination
D cannot influence girls'lives and interests2022贵州公务员考试时间
27.According to Paragraph2,which of the following is true of colours?
A Colors are encoded in girls'DNA
B Blue used to be regarded as the color for girls
C Pink used to be a neutral color in symbolizing genders
D White is preferred by babies
28.The author suggests that our perception of children's psychological devotement was much influenced by ________.
[A]the marketing of products for children
[B]the observation of children's nature
[C]researches into children's behavior
[D]studies of childhood consumption
29.We may learn from Paragraph4that department stores were advised________.
A focuses on infant wear and older kids'clothes
B attach equal importance to different genders
C classify consumers into smaller groups
D create some common shoppers'terms
30.It can be concluded that girl's attraction to pink seems to be_____.
广东春季高考录取查询
A clearly explained by their inborn tendency
B fully understood by clothing manufacturers
C mainly imposed by profit-driven businessmen
D well interpreted by psychological experts
Text3
In2010.a federal judge shook America's biotech industry to its core.Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades-by2005some20%of human genes were patented.But in March2010a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable.Executives were violently agitated.The Biotechnology Industry Organisation(BIO),a trade group,assured members that this was just a“preliminary step”in a longer battle.
On July29th they were relieved,at least temporarily.A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Myriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman's risk of breast cancer.The chief executive of Myriad,a company in Utah,said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.
But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine,the courts will remain rather busy.The Myriad case itself is probably not over.Critics make three main arguments against gene patents:a gene is a product of nature,so it may not be patented;gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it;and patents'monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad's.A grow
ing number seem to agree.Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests.In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case,arguing that an isolated DNA molecule“is no less a product han are cotton fibres that have been
separated from cotton seeds.”
Despite the appeals court's decision,big questions remain unanswered.For example,it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it.The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.
AS the industry advances,however,other suits may have an even greater impact.Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules-most are already patented or in the public domain.firms are now studying how genes interact,looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’s efficacy.Companies are eager to win patents for‘connecting the dots’,explains Hans Sauer,a lawyer for the BIO.
Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue,brought by the Mayo Clinic,which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term.The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyers on the shifting landscape for patents.Each meeting was packed.
上海公务员考试时间31.It can be learned from paragraph I that the biotech companies would like______
A.their executives to be active
B.judges to rule out gene patenting
D.the BIO to issue a warning
32.Those who are against gene patents believe that_____
C.patents on genes depend much on innovations
33.According to Hans Sauer,companies are eager to win patents for_____
A.establishing disease correlations
B.discovering gene interactions
C.drawing pictures of genes
D.identifying human DNA
34.By saying“each meeting was packed”(line4,para6)the author means that_____
A.the Supreme Court was authoritative
B.the BIO was a powerful organization
< patenting was a great concern
D.lawyers were keen to attend conventions
35.Generally speaking,the author’s attitude toward gene patenting is_____
B.supportive
C.scornful
D.objective
Text4
>河北省农村信用社2021招聘