2020年上半年英语四级考试阅读理解三篇【篇一】2020年上半年英语四级考试阅读理解三篇
One of the bitterest and most time-worm debates in student union bars up and down the country is resolved as academic research confirms that in financial terms at least, arts degrees are a complete waste of time.Getting through university boosts students’earnings by 25%, on a weighted average, or $220,000 over theirlifetime, according to Professor Ian Walker of Warwick University-but if they study Shakespeare or the peasants’revolt instead of anatomy of contract law, those gains are likely to be completely wiped out.
The government is about to allow universities to charge students up to $3,000 a year for their degrees, arguing that it’s a small price to pay compared with the financial rewards graduates reap later in life. But Prof. Walker’s research shows there are sharp variations in returns according to which subject a student takes.
Law, medicine and economics or business are the most lucrative choices, making their average earnings 25% higher, according to the article, published in the office for
na tional statistics’monthly journal. Scientists get 10-15% extra. At the bottom of the list are arts subjects, which make only a “small ”differenceto earnings- a small negative one, in fact. Just ahead are
degrees in education-which leave hard pressed teachers anaverage of 5% better off a year than if they had left school at 18.
“it’s hard to resist the conclusion that what students learn does matter a lot; and some subject areas givemore modest financial returns than others,” Prof. Walker said. As an economist, he was quick to point outthat students might gain non-financial returns from arts degrees：”Studying economics might be very dull, forexample, and studying post-modernism might be a lot of fun.”
练习题：
Choose correct answers to the question：
1.What is the best title for the passage?
A.Professor Walker’s Research
B.How to Make Big Money.
C.Differences Between Science and Arts Degrees.
D.Studying Arts Has Negative Financial Outcome.护士分数线
2.Universities charge students a rather high tuition mainly because_____
A.they provide the students with very prosperous subjects to learn
B.they assume that their graduates can earn much more than they had paid
C.they don’t get financial support from the government
D.they need much revenue to support the educational expenses
3.The word “lucrative”(Line 1, Para. 4) most probably means _____
A.sensible
C.profitable
4.Law, medical and business graduates could earn 25% more than ______
A.education graduates
南通招工信息最新招聘B.arts graduates
C.those who had not studied at the university
D.the average income
5.We can safely conclude that the author ______
B.finds this result disappointing and unfair
C.wants the students to think twice before they decide what to learn in college
D.holds that arts degrees are still rewarding despite its scarce financial returns
1.[D] 主旨大意题。本文为Walker教授的研究成果，旨在说明不同专业的毕业生有不同的经济回报，并非要传授发财心得或者比较文理科的异同。文章首句即为本题解题关键，故D准确。
2.[B] 事实细节题。定位至第3段第1句。本文只有这个句与收
取学费相关，后一个分句即前一个分句的理由，抓住其中隐含的因果
关系就不难到准确答案。
3.[C] 词义理解题。通过下文数据earnings 25% higher和get
10-15% extra能够推测lucrative大意应为“给人带来丰厚收入的”，故选C。
4.[C] 事实细节题。第4段中出现了几个比较数字，考题要求
到此段首句提到的收人增加25%的参照点。第2段第1句中的Getting through university 表明这类学生收人增加25%的参照对象是没读大
雅思考试网上报名学的人，且从第4段第3句中的the list和第4句即能够确定这个段
2021国考职位表下载xls是在比较大学毕业与18岁毕业(即没读大学)收入的不同，所以C准确。
5.[D] 推理判断题。结论往往出现在文章结尾，要想答对此题，一
作者并没有做出主观判断，故A、B、C都不准确，而作者在文章最后
讲到了人文学科虽然经济效益不佳但学习过程更有趣，故D符合作者
意思。
【篇二】2020年上半年英语四级考试阅读理解三篇
Some houses are designed to be smart. Others have smart designs. An example of the second type of house won an Award
of Excellence from the American Institute of Architects.
Located on the shore of Sullivan’s Island off the coast
of South Carolina, the award-winning cube-shaped beach house was built to replace one smashed to pieces by Hurricane (飓风) Hugo 10 years ago. In September1989, Hugo struck South Carolina, killing 18 people and damaging or destroying 36,000 homes in the state.
Before Hugo, many new houses built along South
我却后悔了Carolina’s shoreline were poorly constructed, and enforcement of building codes wasn’t strict, accor
ding to architect Ray Huff, who created the cleverly-designed beach house. In Hugo’s wake, all new shoreline houses are required to meet stricter, better-enforced codes.The new beach house on Sullivan’s Island should be able to withstand a Category 3 hurricane with peak winds of 179 to 209 kilometers per hour.
At first sight, the house on Sullivan’s Island looks anything but hurricane-proof. Its redwood shell makes it resemble “a large party lantern (灯笼)” at night, according to one observer. But looks can be deceiving. The house’s wooden frame is reinforced with long steel rods to give it extra strength.
To further protect the house from hurricane damage, Huff raised it 2.7 meters off the ground on timber pilings—long, slender columns of wood anchored deep in the sand. Pilings might appear insecure, but they arestrong enough to support the weight of the house. They also elevate the house above storm surges. The pilings allow the surges to run under the house instead of running into it. “These swells of water come ashore at tremendous speeds and cause most of the damage done to beach-front buildings,” said Huff.2021河南省公务员职位表
Huff designed the timber pilings to be partially concealed by the house’s ground-to-roof shell. “ The shell masks the pilings so that the house doesn’t look like it’s standing with its pant legs pulled up,” s
aid Huff. In the event of a storm surge, the shell should break apart and let the waves rush under the house, the architect explained.
发布评论