2021年6月英语六级真题及参考答案完整版
注：对题目和选项内容，不要纠结套数、ABCD顺序的问题
无忧考网搜集整理了各个版本(有文字也有图片，图片可以自由拉伸)，仅供大家参考。
网络综合版：
听力
Conversation One
Man: (1) It's my last day at work tomorrow. I'll start my new job in 2 weeks. My human resources manager wants to conduct an interview with me before I leave.
Woman: Ah, an exit interview. Are you looking forward to it?
Man: I'm not sure how I feel about it. I resigned because I've been unhappy at that company for a long time, but I'm not sure if I should tell them how I really feel.
Woman: To my way of thinking, there are two main potential benefits that come from unleashing and agitated stream of truth during an exit interview. The first is release. Unburdening yourself of frustration, and perhaps even anger to someone who isn't a friend or close colleague can be wonderfully free. Man: Let me guess. The second is that the criticism will, theoretically, help the organization I'm leaving to improve, making sure employees of the future are less likely to encounter what I did?
Woman: That's right. But the problem with the company improvement part is that very often it doesn't happen. An exit interview is supposed to be private, but often isn't. In my company, the information gained from these interviews is often not confidential. (2) The information is used as dirt against another manager, or can be traded among senior managers.
Man: Now you've got me rethinking what I'll disclose in the interview. (3) There is always a chance that it could affect my reputation
and my ability to network in the industry. It is a pretty small industry after all.
Woman: Anything you initially gained from the instant satisfaction of telling it like it is, you might lose down the track by injuring your future career prospects.
Man: Right. (4) Perhaps I would be better getting things off my chest by going to one of those rate-your-employer websites.
Woman: You could. And don't do the interview at all. Exit interviews are not mandatory.
Q1: What do we learn about the man from the conversation?
A) He will tell the management how he really feels.
B)He will meet his new manager in two weeks.
C) He is going to attend a job interview.
D) He is going to leave his present job.
Q2: What does the woman think of the information gained from an exit interview?
A) It should be kept private.
安全教育平台登录入口B) It should be carefully analyzed.
C) It can be quite useful to senior managers.
D)It can improve interviewees' job prospects.
Q3: Why does the man want to rethink what he will say in the coming exit interview?
A)It may leave a negative impression on the interviewer.
B)It may adversely affect his future career prospects.
C)It may displease his immediate superiors.
D) It may do harm to his fellow employees.
Q4: What does the man think he had better do?
A)Prepare a comprehensive exit report.
B)Do some practice for the exit interview.
C)Network with his close friends to find a better employer.
D)Pour out his frustrations on a rate-your-employer website.
Conversation Two
Man: Today, I’m talking to the renowned botanist, Jane Foster.
Woman: Thank you for inviting me to join you on the show, Henry.
Man: Recently, Jane, you’ve become quite a celebrity,(5) since the release of your latest documentary. Can you tell us a little about it?
Woman: Well, it follows my expedition to study the vegetation indigenous to the rain forest in equatorial areas of southeast Asia.
Man: You certainly get to travel to some very exotic locations.
Woman: It was far from glamorous, to be honest. The area we visited was accessible only by canoe and the living conditions in the hut were primitive to say the least. (6) There was no electricity. Our water supply was a nearby stream.
Man: How were the weather conditions while you were there?
贵港招聘网最新招聘
Woman: The weather was not conducive to our work at all, since the humidity was almost unbearable. At midday, we stayed in the hut and did nothing. (6) It was too humid to either work or sleep.
Man: How long did your team spend in the jungle?
Woman: Originally, we planned to be there for a month. But in the end, we stayed for only 2 weeks.
Man: Why did you cut the expedition short?
Woman: Halfway through the trip, (7) we received news that a hurricane was approaching. We had to evacuate on very short notice.
Man: That sounds like a fascinating anecdote.
Woman: It was frightening. The fastest evacuation route was through river Rapids. We had to navigate them carrying all of our equipment.
Man: (8) So overall was the journey unsuccessful?
Woman: (8) Absolutely not. We gathered a massive amount of data about the local plant life.
Man: Why do you put up with such adverse conditions?
云南大学研究生分数线2022Woman: Botany is an obsession for me. Many of the destinations I visit have a stunning scenery. I get to meet a variety of people from all over the world. Man: So where will your next destination be?
Woman: I haven't decided yet.
Man: Then we can leave it for another vacation. Thanks.
Questions 5 to 8 are based on the conversation you have just heard.
Q5: What does the man want Jane Foster to talk about?
A) Her unsuccessful journey
注册会计师协会准考证打印入口B)Her month-long expedition
C)Her latest documentary
D)Her career as a botanist
Q6: Why does the woman describe her experience as far from glamorous?
A)She had to live like a vegetarian
B)She was caught in a hurricane.
C) She had to endure many hardships
D) She suffered from water shortage
Q7: Why did the woman and those who went with her end their trip halfway?
河南公务员考试成绩什么时候公布A)A hurricane was coming
B)A flood was approaching
C)They had no more food in the canoe.
D) They could no longer bear the humidity
Q8: What does the woman think of the journey?
A) It was memorable
B)It was unbearable
163招聘网C) It was uneventful
D)It was fruitful
Passage One
Scientists often use specialized jargon terms while communicating with laymen. (9) Most of them don't realize the harmful effects of this practice. In a new study, people exposed to jargon when reading about subjects like autonomous vehicles and surgical robots. Later said they were less interesting in science than others who read about the same topics, but without the use of specialized terms. They also felt less informed about science and less qualified to discuss science topics. It's noteworthy that it made no difference if the jargon terms were defined in the text. Even when the terms were defined, readers still felt the same lack of engagement as readers who read jargon that wasn't explained.
The problem is that the mere presence of jargon sends a discouraging message to readers. Hillary Schulman, the author of the study, asserts that specialized words are a signal. Jargon tells people th
at the message isn't for them. There's an even darker side to how people react to jargon. (10) In another study, researchers found that reading scientific articles containing jargon led people to doubt the actual science. They found the opposite, when a text is easier to read. Then. People are more persuaded. Thus, it's important to communicate clearly when talking about complex science subjects. This is especially true with issues related to public health, like the safety of new medications and the benefits of vaccines. （11）Schulman concedes that the use of jargon is appropriate with scientific audiences. But scientists who want to communicate with the general public need to modify their language. They need to eliminate jargon.
发布评论